16-01-2016, 13:27
|
RIFC
|
16-01-2016, 13:27
16-01-2016, 13:36
After all he is a man of substantial means
19-01-2016, 16:33
The sublime:
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/14214...ef=mr&lp=2 The ridiculous: http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/14214...ef=mr&lp=4
22-01-2016, 13:16
King cleared of contempt.
It's all going Pete Tong for Mr Ashley in the courts. See what happens when you stand up to a genuine bully. 
Mr Justice Peter Smith seems to be an exceptionally diligent and insightful man. I think I like him.
 http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016...gers-boss/
22-01-2016, 15:32
(This post was last modified: 22-01-2016, 15:37 by TheWorthinGer.)
Ashley ordered to pay all costs on "indemnity basis" meaning over the odds.
Nice one. http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/indemnit...ullarticle Rangers, can charge top rate fees for the time of any in house lawyers etc and so can hired in barristers. This is going to sting. Maybe not cash wise but his "tanks on the lawn" reputation will be suffering.
22-01-2016, 16:50
His shareholders will not be happy one jot. That was a barrowload of negative publicity for the company.
22-01-2016, 17:01
He'll just take it out the money he's made on rangers shirt sales.
22-01-2016, 17:32
He can't touch a penny of that money without giving half of it to us. It's part of the dividend agreement.
22-01-2016, 18:31
So they reckon sports direct made £8m on Rangers retail over two years and you say he can't touch a penny or is it just the money on shirt sales alone he can't touch??
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|