That crass practise alone just confirms the kinda dishonourable, arrogant c#### that infect the Govan club these days! They are still there and look like they won't go away any time soon. Even their bbc 'standoff' says a lot re their crass attitude and bullying to any kinda criticism that comes their way - how many years since their 'huffy standoff' began!? Contrary to a lotta biased opinion re Rangers and the so called 'benefit to the Scottish game', I think Scottish footie would benefit greatly if they were removed altogether!! It depends on your viewpoint re the sport and the poisonous nature of people who abuse that sport and use it as a 'platform of hate' and other misdemeanours! One of the worst things about Rangers FC is they think they are bigger than the game itself - still living in the past when they had very questionable and unhealthy 'powers of influence'!! I thought John Hartson called it right yesterday on bbc Sportsound when he said a 'strong Rangers' was 'good for Rangers' and not that good for Scottish footie and contrary to some of the sycophantic and biased comments from other 'guests' on the program who were firmly 'put in their place'.
Pedro Caixinha
30-10-2017, 14:13
According to the news there Aberdeen have a 1.5 million compensation clause inserted in mcinnes's contract.
We will see eh ?
We will see eh ?
30-10-2017, 14:26
Rangers will just pay it in instalments eh lol! Deja vu and told to f### off before by Hibs!
01-11-2017, 19:01
Pedro says he's not had a settlement pay off.
King says he has.
King says he has.
04-11-2017, 12:57
Interesting figures from sevco there. Confirming their 'owners' are simply keeping the lights on and not a lot else. King had to pay 3.3 million for Ashley to get out of that retail deal, yet looking at the news articles of the time you would think ashley ripped it up just out pure rangersitis.
Bottom line - They need 4 million in loans to get through the season,from a man who is arguing in court currently that he is skint
Mcinnes would be off his chump to go anywhere near these jokers,NOTE " The forecast cash flows assumes future transfer payables will be met by future transfer receivables."
I actually think murty could get the gig if he does halfway ok.
At what point does the SFA start asking questions ? At what point do their fans start asking questions ? In fact scratch that last part, this is a fan base that thought some halfwit crook from lanarkshire was one of the richest men in the world
On the surface it looks like they will go down the tubes again.
Bottom line - They need 4 million in loans to get through the season,from a man who is arguing in court currently that he is skint
Mcinnes would be off his chump to go anywhere near these jokers,NOTE " The forecast cash flows assumes future transfer payables will be met by future transfer receivables." I actually think murty could get the gig if he does halfway ok.
At what point does the SFA start asking questions ? At what point do their fans start asking questions ? In fact scratch that last part, this is a fan base that thought some halfwit crook from lanarkshire was one of the richest men in the world
On the surface it looks like they will go down the tubes again.
07-11-2017, 18:20
the real problem is with expectations
They are still behaving like the old club, they are not and its as simple as that.
5 years ago they should have started building from the bottom.
Youth system and scouting first, then step by step incremental improvement.
Because they wanted to be "billy big baws" they squandered the chance to unload 180 million of debt and start from afresh
Their cash burn rate is almost as bad as old co.
They started with 5 mill in the bank, raised 18 million after expenses in a share issue and are now 15m in debt to the share holders with 7 million of debt owed to football clubs as after accounts debts. And another 7 million extra needed over 18 months just to keep the lights on.
So after 5 years on top of all their revenue and ticket sales they have burned through 44m of extra cash and astounding 9m ish per year, with more required.
They are still behaving like the old club, they are not and its as simple as that.
5 years ago they should have started building from the bottom.
Youth system and scouting first, then step by step incremental improvement.
Because they wanted to be "billy big baws" they squandered the chance to unload 180 million of debt and start from afresh
Their cash burn rate is almost as bad as old co.
They started with 5 mill in the bank, raised 18 million after expenses in a share issue and are now 15m in debt to the share holders with 7 million of debt owed to football clubs as after accounts debts. And another 7 million extra needed over 18 months just to keep the lights on.
So after 5 years on top of all their revenue and ticket sales they have burned through 44m of extra cash and astounding 9m ish per year, with more required.
23-11-2017, 18:47
24-11-2017, 00:27
He would have been very stupid to go to Rangers in their current non-transparent state and I never thought McInnes was that 'daft' anywayTBF!
24-11-2017, 05:00
His stock is steadily rising at Aberdeen, he should stay there but I think his next step might be to a Championship club in England.
24-11-2017, 16:24
He knows sevco isn't rangers and he'd be on a hiding to nothing I guess.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »