Posts: 5,016
Threads: 298
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
1
I don't agree. If she knew she was injured and supposed to be out for 3 months, she should have stepped down and let someone else go.
Posts: 8,988
Threads: 154
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
15
Given we only entered two women, that wouldn't have happened.
A guide to cask ale.
“In the best pubs, you can spend entire afternoons deep in refreshment without a care in the world.”
Posts: 5,016
Threads: 298
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
1
31-07-2021, 15:42
(This post was last modified: 31-07-2021, 15:43 by Amelia Chaffinch.)
Even so, a waste of money sending her. I am unanimous in that!
We'll have taken enough 4 x oners. Surely one of them could have made the grade?
Posts: 6,246
Threads: 245
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
13
A bit harsh on Dina there, Amelia. She thought she had a medal chance, the team obviously thought she had a medal chance, so it was right for her to travel. I can understand why she got her explanation in first, though. Admittedly I could have done without the emotional performance, but that sort of thing is just not my style.
I think the qualification times are harder for an individual athlete compared to relay squad athletes. You could argue that it was a waste of money sending half the team because they didn't have a realistic medal chance.
Lord Snooty likes this post
Cabbage is still good for you
Posts: 20,368
Threads: 890
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
21
Just listened to her again and it was a tear, not a rupture. The rupture would've needed surgery.
Posts: 5,016
Threads: 298
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
1
I still think track athletes are whiney.