20-11-2015, 17:53
Trusevich Wrote:hibeejim21 Wrote:BDOs have said today they are "reviewing the judgment and are considering their position".
Nothing confirmed.
Absolutely.
The Herald article doesn't confirm it as a done deal. They say that it'll be confirmed next week, so they're claiming toi have some sort of inside knowledge seeing as the appeal application deadline is 2nd December.
Paigntonhibby Wrote:TheWorthinGer Wrote:Are you really so unable to understand my post? Let me explain in short burstswhat I said minty and the glib and shameless one said,FACT,not a claim. what I said about Ogilvie, FACT, not a claim. if you want tae call me a wanker and an idiot,carry on, i'll dae my best no' tae lose any sleep, but whatever you call me disnae change the FACT that what I said is true .After SCOs post the guests on here said that whatever the opinion offered personal abuse was out of order,then along you come,predictable as ever
You think it is for others to disprove your claims.
Ergo, someone calls you a wanker and an idiot and it's true, fact unless you can prove otherwise.
However, it's for the poster to prove that what they post as fact is so.
Otherwise, you are a wanker and an idiot...because someone posted it.
He didn't call you a wanker or an idiot. You are misunderstanding his words, and jumping to a knee-jerk over-reaction.
Why bother, if you don't stand on a biscuit tin and shout in a pseudo language he obviously can't understand.
Let's face it, he has failed grasp anything of what I posted. And I made it simple enough for a wanking idiot to take in.