[Paigntonhibby]

If you post something it's for you to prove that it's true, and not otherwise.

The alternative is that you are a wanker and an idiot - because someone posted the "fact".  Not that I'd argue otherwise, I've seen lots of the evidence.

there ye go SCO, keyboard f#cking warriors, probably widnae have the bottle tae say it face tae face. basically St.Charles if yer brogues dinnae toe the party line yer a wanker and an idiot, if you have an opinion that differs fae theirs,yer a wanker and an idiot. and if ye quote facts that they dinnae agree wi' that's right,yer a wanker and and an idiot. fortunately I couldnae gie a toss what any rangers supporters think about me but i'll keep coming on here giving my opin ion and if they gie me abuse they'll get it back. f#ck 'em

---

Are you really so unable to understand my post?  Let me explain in short bursts:

You think it is for others to disprove your claims.

Ergo, someone calls you a wanker and an idiot and it's true, fact unless you can prove otherwise.

However, it's for the poster to prove that what they post as fact is so.

Otherwise, you are a wanker and an idiot...because someone posted it.

what I said minty and the glib and shameless one said,FACT,not a claim. what I said about Ogilvie, FACT, not a claim. if you want tae call me a wanker and an idiot,carry on, i'll dae my best no' tae lose any sleep, but whatever you call me disnae change the FACT that what I said is true .After SCOs post the guests on here said that whatever the opinion offered personal abuse was out of order,then along you come,predictable as ever