20-11-2015, 14:25
(This post was last modified: 20-11-2015, 14:32 by TheWorthinGer.)
Paigntonhibb Wrote:TheWorthinGer Wrote:If you post something it's for you to prove that it's true, and not otherwise.there ye go SCO, keyboard f#cking warriors, probably widnae have the bottle tae say it face tae face. basically St.Charles if yer brogues dinnae toe the party line yer a wanker and an idiot, if you have an opinion that differs fae theirs,yer a wanker and an idiot. and if ye quote facts that they dinnae agree wi' that's right,yer a wanker and and an idiot. fortunately I couldnae gie a toss what any rangers supporters think about me but i'll keep coming on here giving my opin ion and if they gie me abuse they'll get it back. f#ck 'em
The alternative is that you are a wanker and an idiot - because someone posted the "fact". Not that I'd argue otherwise, I've seen lots of the evidence.
Are you really so unable to understand my post? Let me explain in short bursts:
You think it is for others to disprove your claims.
Ergo, someone calls you a wanker and an idiot and it's true, fact unless you can prove otherwise.
However, it's for the poster to prove that what they post as fact is so.
Otherwise, you are a wanker and an idiot...because someone posted it.
Logic, it's only hard if you hit yourself with it.
If an individual makes a statement this does not change history - alternate history is an exercise of the imagination and no more.
So, if X states that Y may not have signed this does not mean that anyone cheated and it does not affect history anywhere but in the imagination of wishful thinkers.
Why? Because we can all play that game: Z would have signed for less money and been much better. See.
Oh, and I'm a Road Warrior.
Here's an example of a wishful thinker:
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/footb...nd-6864744
26 points.