13-11-2015, 22:04
I'm surprised to read that a lawyer put forward an argument that supported his clients case. Amazing. Astounding.
If we are to take his putting forward his client's case as an example of what constitutes "fact", why are so many people - who's lawyer stated quite categorically that they were innocent - in prison?
What happens when the other lawyer(s) in the court state their client's case? Of more "facts". Facts contradicting facts.
A lawyer is an advocate and he says what his client tells him to say, just more eloquently than his client can. No more and no less. If it suited his client to argue that Cetic FC was a hive of despicable immoral criminality Mr Brown would have done so and the illiteraty wouldn't have posted a word of it on here.
Furthermore, we've already established that a club "is a group of people who come together for a common purpose".
If we are to take his putting forward his client's case as an example of what constitutes "fact", why are so many people - who's lawyer stated quite categorically that they were innocent - in prison?
What happens when the other lawyer(s) in the court state their client's case? Of more "facts". Facts contradicting facts.
A lawyer is an advocate and he says what his client tells him to say, just more eloquently than his client can. No more and no less. If it suited his client to argue that Cetic FC was a hive of despicable immoral criminality Mr Brown would have done so and the illiteraty wouldn't have posted a word of it on here.
Furthermore, we've already established that a club "is a group of people who come together for a common purpose".