06-11-2015, 16:54
(This post was last modified: 06-11-2015, 16:56 by hibeejim21.)
"The totals over a 10 year period only amounted to 47m and this included a number of non-playing staff including Murray himself, so I would guess that the "sporting" aspect of this only amounted to 2-3m per season anyway and that is hardly likely to be enough to provide a sporting advantage to the degree that some are claiming"
The other problem with SCOs argument is that it fails to take into account the amount of prize money and champions league revenue they raked in via their non payment of tax. They must have pulled in around 100 mill more than they should have had. It gave rangers an advantage they did not deserve on sporting merit.
Teams have been booted out of cup competitions in scotland for minor infractions,a lot of scottish football fans will not be happy if this just gets brushed under the carpet.
The other problem with SCOs argument is that it fails to take into account the amount of prize money and champions league revenue they raked in via their non payment of tax. They must have pulled in around 100 mill more than they should have had. It gave rangers an advantage they did not deserve on sporting merit.
Teams have been booted out of cup competitions in scotland for minor infractions,a lot of scottish football fans will not be happy if this just gets brushed under the carpet.