27-05-2015, 16:59
They've already held talks with SD about contracts and I suspect that they were fruitless.
This isn't stage one, possibly not even stage two. I don't know what's going on but something is.
I want to know what the point of the boards motion is? MASH own shares - is it MASH that own SD, or Ashley's part of it? What kind of legal tangle would there be visavis this being the situation and the motion carrying? Could a shareholder - MASH- legitimately obstruct the board carrying out the legitimate wishes of fellow shareholders? Conflict of interest case for instance.
Makes my head spin.
This isn't stage one, possibly not even stage two. I don't know what's going on but something is.
I want to know what the point of the boards motion is? MASH own shares - is it MASH that own SD, or Ashley's part of it? What kind of legal tangle would there be visavis this being the situation and the motion carrying? Could a shareholder - MASH- legitimately obstruct the board carrying out the legitimate wishes of fellow shareholders? Conflict of interest case for instance.
Makes my head spin.