27-05-2015, 11:16
(This post was last modified: 27-05-2015, 11:25 by TheWorthinGer.)
Yeah, but if you suggest such a move in this way - via agm notice etc - you will have taken legal advice on the feasibility.
If you are saying the such a move isn't possible or it would be effectively illegal why bother even mentioning it?
I'm also musing over the renegotiation of contracts motion. What's behind it?
If shareholders vote this through - and I'm sure that they will - what sort of legal leverage does this give the board? If none then what's the point? Or, and I think this a possibility and again I'm not any kind of lawyer, would it remove personal liability from board members of they opted to renege on the contracts and SD sued?
Ashley is no doubt a very shrewd operator, but I think King's a wily one too. Their manoeuvres intrigue me.
If you are saying the such a move isn't possible or it would be effectively illegal why bother even mentioning it?
I'm also musing over the renegotiation of contracts motion. What's behind it?
If shareholders vote this through - and I'm sure that they will - what sort of legal leverage does this give the board? If none then what's the point? Or, and I think this a possibility and again I'm not any kind of lawyer, would it remove personal liability from board members of they opted to renege on the contracts and SD sued?
Ashley is no doubt a very shrewd operator, but I think King's a wily one too. Their manoeuvres intrigue me.