08-01-2025, 09:02
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2025, 13:09 by Statesideowl.)
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2w849rk69o
The enabling language these hacks use is disgraceful.
They're not 'Migrants' they're illegal entries, they did not enter through a legal port either.
The final paragraph from enabling Home Office using rhetoric to portray illegal immigrants who seek to deliberately undermine the migration process as not just 'vulnerable' but the REAL victims in all of this.
Also, these 'people smuggling gangs' can we stop the softening of language around Islam's transgressions, please?
They're human traffickers and if these 'Migrants' are genuinely fleeing war, persecution and poverty, where do they get the thousands to pay the human traffickers?
How do they end up with a Dinghy powered by an outboard motor complete with life jackets?
How are they all wearing brand new clothes, new shoes and phones?
Why are they all men but all we hear about in the news is 'women and children drowning'??
Can people not grasp the optics of the situation and apply critical thinking?
It's purely to provoke an emotional response and soften the public opinion
I mean, think of the children, right??
Unless it's native children being groomed by gangs of men from the above demographic. Then suddenly children don't matter as much, do they?
So can we get to the truth now..?
Let's not forget that Starmer is Lord Ali's little Ken doll. Dressing him, buying him glasses for future favour's for his own religious community.
Oh, and I wonder how many caught Starmers language when he mentioned "Muslim's abused in THEIR OWN country"
Has he ever addressed the native in such a way calling it YOUR own country or natives disproportionately targeted by religious groups in THEIR OWN country? NOPE!!
You'll never hear the state using the context of natives and this being THEIR OWN country. In fact, if a native refers to this as THEIR OWN country, its considered far right speech..
Absolute phukkery on a grand scale. You either see it or you're a mug.
Very, very different rhetoric. Islamisation through the back door.
The enabling language these hacks use is disgraceful.
They're not 'Migrants' they're illegal entries, they did not enter through a legal port either.
The final paragraph from enabling Home Office using rhetoric to portray illegal immigrants who seek to deliberately undermine the migration process as not just 'vulnerable' but the REAL victims in all of this.
Also, these 'people smuggling gangs' can we stop the softening of language around Islam's transgressions, please?
They're human traffickers and if these 'Migrants' are genuinely fleeing war, persecution and poverty, where do they get the thousands to pay the human traffickers?
How do they end up with a Dinghy powered by an outboard motor complete with life jackets?
How are they all wearing brand new clothes, new shoes and phones?
Why are they all men but all we hear about in the news is 'women and children drowning'??
Can people not grasp the optics of the situation and apply critical thinking?
It's purely to provoke an emotional response and soften the public opinion
I mean, think of the children, right??
Unless it's native children being groomed by gangs of men from the above demographic. Then suddenly children don't matter as much, do they?
So can we get to the truth now..?
Let's not forget that Starmer is Lord Ali's little Ken doll. Dressing him, buying him glasses for future favour's for his own religious community.
Oh, and I wonder how many caught Starmers language when he mentioned "Muslim's abused in THEIR OWN country"
Has he ever addressed the native in such a way calling it YOUR own country or natives disproportionately targeted by religious groups in THEIR OWN country? NOPE!!
You'll never hear the state using the context of natives and this being THEIR OWN country. In fact, if a native refers to this as THEIR OWN country, its considered far right speech..
Absolute phukkery on a grand scale. You either see it or you're a mug.
Very, very different rhetoric. Islamisation through the back door.
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." Marcus Aurelius