18-12-2024, 08:41
(This post was last modified: 18-12-2024, 11:44 by Statesideowl.)
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/202...ion-scheme
"The plan is driven by concerns that tackling child terror suspects with powerful terrorism laws stigmatises them when they are not yet fully mature.
Counter-terrorism officials believe that a section of those arrested, while clearly breaking terrorism laws for having online material such as terrorism manifestos, pose little threat of staging an attack.
The days of terror suspects being driven primarily by a clear ideology are long gone, with most either showing no ideology or it being unclear.
Thus suspects, especially those aged 17 or under, lack a strong commitment to an ideological cause, with a substantial amount having mental health or other vulnerabilities that make them more susceptible to terrorist propaganda."
Absolutely disgraceful. Laying the groundwork to further enable a certain religious community in its transgressions...
"The days of terror suspects being driven by a clear ideology are long gone"
What sick BS is this? More state propaganda pushed by hacky state journalists. Making sure to plant "mental health" as the deceptive seed in naive minds.
Now there's going to be nuts and lentils arseholes claiming "Terrorists no longer have ideologies " like our religious community so "stop blaming radical muslims"
Just so happens. They don't want to include terrorist materials being found like Rudakubana was with the Al Qaida training manual.
Now we've changed the definition , making ricin at home from a proscribed Terrorists organisation handbook then attacking native children ISN'T terrorism?
Holeephukingshit
So, now the intention is to obfuscate the definition of Terrorism where it can be bounced off the religious community and stick to the native community.
White natives gathering is racist terrorism, especially going by the rhetoric used by blue hairs at protests and on campus.
Another example of the state softening language around ethnic or religious groups or downplaying their transgressions.
It's unfair for little Ahmed to have the negative stigma of terrorist offences following him through life.
It's entirely acceptable for native Dave's 20yr old marijuana conviction to follow him through life though..
People need to start connecting the dots, it's really fking easy...
"The plan is driven by concerns that tackling child terror suspects with powerful terrorism laws stigmatises them when they are not yet fully mature.
Counter-terrorism officials believe that a section of those arrested, while clearly breaking terrorism laws for having online material such as terrorism manifestos, pose little threat of staging an attack.
The days of terror suspects being driven primarily by a clear ideology are long gone, with most either showing no ideology or it being unclear.
Thus suspects, especially those aged 17 or under, lack a strong commitment to an ideological cause, with a substantial amount having mental health or other vulnerabilities that make them more susceptible to terrorist propaganda."
Absolutely disgraceful. Laying the groundwork to further enable a certain religious community in its transgressions...
"The days of terror suspects being driven by a clear ideology are long gone"
What sick BS is this? More state propaganda pushed by hacky state journalists. Making sure to plant "mental health" as the deceptive seed in naive minds.
Now there's going to be nuts and lentils arseholes claiming "Terrorists no longer have ideologies " like our religious community so "stop blaming radical muslims"
Just so happens. They don't want to include terrorist materials being found like Rudakubana was with the Al Qaida training manual.
Now we've changed the definition , making ricin at home from a proscribed Terrorists organisation handbook then attacking native children ISN'T terrorism?
Holeephukingshit
So, now the intention is to obfuscate the definition of Terrorism where it can be bounced off the religious community and stick to the native community.
White natives gathering is racist terrorism, especially going by the rhetoric used by blue hairs at protests and on campus.
Another example of the state softening language around ethnic or religious groups or downplaying their transgressions.
It's unfair for little Ahmed to have the negative stigma of terrorist offences following him through life.
It's entirely acceptable for native Dave's 20yr old marijuana conviction to follow him through life though..
People need to start connecting the dots, it's really fking easy...
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." Marcus Aurelius