26-08-2024, 16:22
(This post was last modified: 26-08-2024, 17:28 by Statesideowl.)
Labour.. a little information about them.
"The party has formally adopted the APPG definition of ‘Islamophobia’, which defines ‘Islamophobia’ as a ‘type of racism’. This definition effectively prohibits the criticism of Islamic beliefs and practices.
So when the party promises a new Race Equality Act and more monitoring of ‘Islamophobia’, there is a real chance of a de facto Islamic blasphemy law."
"If Labour gets into power and incorporates the APPG definition into law — which seems to be increasingly likely — “offensive” incidents like these could easily become a criminal matter. That’s because the definition is so ambiguous it has the potential to capture a panoply of scenarios — not least legitimate criticism of religious doctrine, extremism, and the mere utterance of historical truths."
Anyone who values freedom of expression in modern Britain, should, by now, be very concerned. Yet they're not. The centrist majority are trapped between dick heads. Most people just want to get along and have a quiet existence. The far right are fewer in numbers than the faux left. The faux left are far more problematic than the far right. The enabling, the parroting of the state's propaganda. The destruction of native cultures. That's the faux left.
The real left would distinguish between actual far right militant members and disenfranchised proletariat and not tar them all with the same brush.
The real left would be kicking off about Starmer robbing pensioners, raising energy prices and raising taxes. Not to mention his thinly veiled attack on free speech in Britain and introducing the Islamic blasphemy law through the back door.
Which again, is exactly what I said is going to happen.
Mouthbreathers still saying "Duhhh it's the EDL who are the problem "
"The party has formally adopted the APPG definition of ‘Islamophobia’, which defines ‘Islamophobia’ as a ‘type of racism’. This definition effectively prohibits the criticism of Islamic beliefs and practices.
So when the party promises a new Race Equality Act and more monitoring of ‘Islamophobia’, there is a real chance of a de facto Islamic blasphemy law."
"If Labour gets into power and incorporates the APPG definition into law — which seems to be increasingly likely — “offensive” incidents like these could easily become a criminal matter. That’s because the definition is so ambiguous it has the potential to capture a panoply of scenarios — not least legitimate criticism of religious doctrine, extremism, and the mere utterance of historical truths."
Anyone who values freedom of expression in modern Britain, should, by now, be very concerned. Yet they're not. The centrist majority are trapped between dick heads. Most people just want to get along and have a quiet existence. The far right are fewer in numbers than the faux left. The faux left are far more problematic than the far right. The enabling, the parroting of the state's propaganda. The destruction of native cultures. That's the faux left.
The real left would distinguish between actual far right militant members and disenfranchised proletariat and not tar them all with the same brush.
The real left would be kicking off about Starmer robbing pensioners, raising energy prices and raising taxes. Not to mention his thinly veiled attack on free speech in Britain and introducing the Islamic blasphemy law through the back door.
Which again, is exactly what I said is going to happen.
Mouthbreathers still saying "Duhhh it's the EDL who are the problem "
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." Marcus Aurelius