[TheWorthinGer]

Any update on the mystery Dingwall supporter?

---

SCO - I would imagine that the company's articles of association (or whatever it's called) would take precedence over the content of any contract, and they allow form he removal of board members via a shareholder vote.

I think Ashley was reliant on the SFA saying yes to a 29.9% holding - shares he would have picked up for a song. Then, in order to stifle dissent, he only needs 0.1% to trigger an automatic takeover at the highest price he paid in the previous 12 months. And he would have some extra in the hands of the likes of Easdale.

No, for the first time in a long time, I think the SFA actually acted with a bit of foresight - and maybe some self interest from then other clubs: they do want a healthy Rangers in the top division as it makes them money, but they don't really want one being bankrolled, if that was ever his intention, by a bloke with nearly 4 billion in the bank.