04-04-2024, 06:47
(This post was last modified: 04-04-2024, 08:08 by Statesideowl.)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04...criminals/
"Judges have been told to consider more lenient sentences for offenders from “deprived” or “difficult” backgrounds.
The Sentencing Council, the official body responsible for setting guidelines for judges and magistrates, has for the first time spelt out “mitigating” factors relating to disadvantage that courts should consider before passing sentence.
The guidelines on “difficult and/or deprived background or personal circumstance” state that these factors include poverty, low educational attainment, experience of discrimination and insecure housing"
The council went ahead with the changes, which took effect on Monday, despite warnings from Alex Chalk, the Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, who said the guidance was “patronising” and “inaccurate”, and risked making poor schooling and poverty excuses for offenders to commit crimes.
During the consultation, concerns were also raised that the new guidelines could lead to better-off, middle class offenders from secure homes being “unfairly disadvantaged” by being handed tougher penalties for the same offence.
It was also pointed out that many people from deprived backgrounds do not offend"
It's important to pay attention to the language being used.
Lenient sentences for those who have faced "Discrimination"
You either see the endless enabling/loopholing of a certain demographic, or you don't.
These laws explain how and why 'persons of colour' are exempt from the classification of 'hate crime'
Now, all the defence needs to argue is that their violent clients have experienced 'discrimination' and viola! A much more lenient sentence.
Yet another day in Clown country UK.
And whilst actual violent members from the religious community are enjoying their crimes being written off or lessened in severity,
Whitey is facing punishment that is blatantly cruel and unjust like this lady trying to work a shitty part time job and caring for family, despite the DWP being entirely at fault!! Not a chance in hell they'd pursue a member from the religious community, they'd scream discrimination and the magic word "racism"
Two tier system at every juncture. Only the over privileged or the ignorant cannot see this.
How else can the IRS explain a taxi driver that only worked 30yrs but somehow owns a string of properties.. get the fk out of here, they're rinsing the place.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-me...727007.amp
One thing is for certain, as soon as I no longer have any obligation to suffer this rat infested crap hole, I'll be leaving, again!
"Judges have been told to consider more lenient sentences for offenders from “deprived” or “difficult” backgrounds.
The Sentencing Council, the official body responsible for setting guidelines for judges and magistrates, has for the first time spelt out “mitigating” factors relating to disadvantage that courts should consider before passing sentence.
The guidelines on “difficult and/or deprived background or personal circumstance” state that these factors include poverty, low educational attainment, experience of discrimination and insecure housing"
The council went ahead with the changes, which took effect on Monday, despite warnings from Alex Chalk, the Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, who said the guidance was “patronising” and “inaccurate”, and risked making poor schooling and poverty excuses for offenders to commit crimes.
During the consultation, concerns were also raised that the new guidelines could lead to better-off, middle class offenders from secure homes being “unfairly disadvantaged” by being handed tougher penalties for the same offence.
It was also pointed out that many people from deprived backgrounds do not offend"
It's important to pay attention to the language being used.
Lenient sentences for those who have faced "Discrimination"
You either see the endless enabling/loopholing of a certain demographic, or you don't.
These laws explain how and why 'persons of colour' are exempt from the classification of 'hate crime'
Now, all the defence needs to argue is that their violent clients have experienced 'discrimination' and viola! A much more lenient sentence.
Yet another day in Clown country UK.
And whilst actual violent members from the religious community are enjoying their crimes being written off or lessened in severity,
Whitey is facing punishment that is blatantly cruel and unjust like this lady trying to work a shitty part time job and caring for family, despite the DWP being entirely at fault!! Not a chance in hell they'd pursue a member from the religious community, they'd scream discrimination and the magic word "racism"
Two tier system at every juncture. Only the over privileged or the ignorant cannot see this.
How else can the IRS explain a taxi driver that only worked 30yrs but somehow owns a string of properties.. get the fk out of here, they're rinsing the place.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-me...727007.amp
One thing is for certain, as soon as I no longer have any obligation to suffer this rat infested crap hole, I'll be leaving, again!
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." Marcus Aurelius