[El Car]

Trus has raised the underlying problem : 'the reality is that neither side can win outright.' (Post #597, above).

Whatever the outcome of the EGM, there is no guarantee that it will put an end to all these boardroom battles. Both sides can muster more than the 25% minimum shareholding to block any further share issues.
If the Dave King camp 'win', the Easedale camp still have at minimum 26% shareholding.
If the Easedale camp 'win', Dave King plus the 3 Bears have over 34% shareholding.

Quite frankly I am sick of both camps and would welcome a hostile takeover from Robert Sarver !!!

The Easdale vote is key to progress really, and while their influence in the boardroom can be ended at the EGM the shareholdings held by the brothers will only increase in value - at least in the short term - if King and the Three Bears get on top of things, so I don't see them going any time soon. However, if they have nothing to gain from an alliance with Ashley they might just throw their lot in with King for the reason I've just mentioned.

---

I don't think it ever was an 'attack on those on the dole'. It was an attack on 'dole-scroungers', not genuine job seekers.

---------------

Anyway:

I just hope on the day the Club will not be embarrassed by idiots

I think we all hope that, it would be self-defeating in all respects.

What are the chances though? We're still weeks away from it and it's already turned into another embarrassing situation. My approach to most things Rangers these days is just to accept that it'll be a horrible mess but it'll pass and we'll get a step closer to stability and respectability. The future's bright, we're just a wee bit away from getting there right now.