I think we're all agreed there is a huge ref prob up here that needs to be resolved. It was already self-evident long before VAR was ever introduced. Agreed there are inherent interpretation issues as mentioned in other previous threads. I still perceive favourable decisions given to a select few footie clubs up here and other very similar decisions not given at all to other Scot footie clubs - absolutely glaring and it is a big factor in positioning said advantaged clubs in high league placings due to some very dodgy ref/VAR calls!! Note VAR decisions already being debated AGAIN after this Scot Cup weekend! NOTE: RANGERS GIVEN A F###### DIABOLICAL PK V PARTICK THISTLE ON A 1-1 SCORE LINE - CONTACT ON KENT CLEARLY WELL OUTSIDE THE THISTLE PEN BOX - REF CORRUPTION IN FULL VIEW!!!!! 
VAR official supposedly reviewed it???????? All radio commentators totally bemused by the decision btw!! Diabolical!! The irony is Tavernier missed the pk!! One element of praise for Michael Beale and Rangers re conceding to Partick's "walk-in" second equalising goal unopposed after a bizarre ungentlemanly "steal" by Tillman from a PT drop-ball (in the process of giving the ball back to Rangers) to make it 2-1. Rangers fans not happy re such an objective decision, but definitely the right one made by Beale.
VAR official supposedly reviewed it???????? All radio commentators totally bemused by the decision btw!! Diabolical!! The irony is Tavernier missed the pk!! One element of praise for Michael Beale and Rangers re conceding to Partick's "walk-in" second equalising goal unopposed after a bizarre ungentlemanly "steal" by Tillman from a PT drop-ball (in the process of giving the ball back to Rangers) to make it 2-1. Rangers fans not happy re such an objective decision, but definitely the right one made by Beale.