07-09-2022, 20:41
0762, to be honest I've nothing against nuclear power stations in themselves, but we should have been building them at least 20 years ago when we knew that they would start to be decommisioned in the following 10 years.
However, it should be remembered that rivers can run dry or flood and that wind can be too strong or too light. That's why I'm amazed that no Government seems interested in pursuing tidal wave power. The technology has been there for years and the tides have been ebbing and flowing for millions of years (just a wild estimate), so why is there a delay in forging ahead with the installation of turbines off the coast?
There's no immediate answer to the current problem of energy cost other than throwing money into a pot to help the poorest in society.
However, it should be remembered that rivers can run dry or flood and that wind can be too strong or too light. That's why I'm amazed that no Government seems interested in pursuing tidal wave power. The technology has been there for years and the tides have been ebbing and flowing for millions of years (just a wild estimate), so why is there a delay in forging ahead with the installation of turbines off the coast?
There's no immediate answer to the current problem of energy cost other than throwing money into a pot to help the poorest in society.
Cabbage is still good for you