After a week of Unionist Media "talking heads" and reports that there was no appetite in Scotland for independence, a bombshell poll dropped in last night lol 
Scottish Labour, Tory and Libdem protagonists will have choked on their Tunnocks tea cakes when they read the Panelbase Research findings via The Times - it revealed Yes for indy in the lead and the Times senior reporters suddenly discovering that their bogus insinuations re lack of interest have been "blown out the water"!!! F### them and their "Project Fear II" campaign that has already been in overdrive following Nicola's dramatic announcement of intent!! It was a ridiculous state of affairs before these results and even more ridiculous after them that complicit anti-Scotland Unionist politicians will try to stand in the way of Scotland even having a say on our future outside of this toxic Union. From The Times to the Spectator, it is curious to observe the shit comments that are no longer "Better Together" ones any more, "pooling and sharing", economic "broad shoulders" etc etc. It's basically cheerleading a position that there is no time or place for a referendum poll!!
They are basically celebrating the suppression of democracy in perpetuity - THEIR POSITION IMO IS UNTENABLE AND THAT'S QUITE A SPACE FOR SUPPOSEDLY LIBERAL OR EVEN LEFT(ISH) PRESS OUTLETS LIKE THE GUARDIAN, THE TIMES, AND THE NEW STATESMAN. The sports pundit and National columnist, Stuart Cosgrove, recently noted: "Such is the grip that Unionism" has over Scotland's public discourse that our best journalists are required to argue that a bleak impoverishing and neo-racist Unionism is preferable to change - sadly true, but one has to wonder if there is any threshold to this behaviour?? How long does it take to defend this miserable state, and specifically the idea that democracy should be suppressed. And yet politicians like Johnson say the exact opposite when talking about the democratic rights of Ukraine and even the Falkland islanders who went through a politically driven "status (indy) referendum" all these years ago. Maybe that's what we Scots need to opt for as well although the two-pronged attack/indy proposal by our esteemed FM will suffice for now.
Scottish Labour, Tory and Libdem protagonists will have choked on their Tunnocks tea cakes when they read the Panelbase Research findings via The Times - it revealed Yes for indy in the lead and the Times senior reporters suddenly discovering that their bogus insinuations re lack of interest have been "blown out the water"!!! F### them and their "Project Fear II" campaign that has already been in overdrive following Nicola's dramatic announcement of intent!! It was a ridiculous state of affairs before these results and even more ridiculous after them that complicit anti-Scotland Unionist politicians will try to stand in the way of Scotland even having a say on our future outside of this toxic Union. From The Times to the Spectator, it is curious to observe the shit comments that are no longer "Better Together" ones any more, "pooling and sharing", economic "broad shoulders" etc etc. It's basically cheerleading a position that there is no time or place for a referendum poll!!
They are basically celebrating the suppression of democracy in perpetuity - THEIR POSITION IMO IS UNTENABLE AND THAT'S QUITE A SPACE FOR SUPPOSEDLY LIBERAL OR EVEN LEFT(ISH) PRESS OUTLETS LIKE THE GUARDIAN, THE TIMES, AND THE NEW STATESMAN. The sports pundit and National columnist, Stuart Cosgrove, recently noted: "Such is the grip that Unionism" has over Scotland's public discourse that our best journalists are required to argue that a bleak impoverishing and neo-racist Unionism is preferable to change - sadly true, but one has to wonder if there is any threshold to this behaviour?? How long does it take to defend this miserable state, and specifically the idea that democracy should be suppressed. And yet politicians like Johnson say the exact opposite when talking about the democratic rights of Ukraine and even the Falkland islanders who went through a politically driven "status (indy) referendum" all these years ago. Maybe that's what we Scots need to opt for as well although the two-pronged attack/indy proposal by our esteemed FM will suffice for now.