I think you should read my thread #83 again re the whole ethical process of managing a referendum and doing it properly!!! I'll "shout to the heavens" until more n more people start scrutinising and dissecting the whole issue of how referenda should be managed and organised properly (millions n millions of folk have already done that and concluded likewise!!!) against lotsa people who are still applying a "first past the post" mentality that has predominated the Brexit debate for years ad nauseum. I'm convinced if 50.5% of the leave vote had actually been recorded in 2016 instead of 52%, lotsa "first past the post" protagonists would still be preaching the same shit - absolutely nuts and that is exactly what it is!! The whole referendum was a f###### sham, pure n simple!! As for Article 50 being signed off, well that should never have happened anyway because a proper post referendum assessment of this "opinion poll" would've rejected the result as normal practise!! This was an utter sham run by a political party with an agenda attached to a govt, a bunch of f###### amateurs when it came to running a referendum that was as important to the country as the 2016 one!! Lastly, the People's vote that Jim refers to is what I'd call a democratic "approval vote" by the people on whatever Brexit version is finally proposed and remaining in the EU should be an option for every voter to consider on the voting form.