01-09-2017, 02:12
(This post was last modified: 01-09-2017, 02:15 by St Charles Owl.)
I think this move fills spaces for both clubs, we have an abundance of strikers and are short in midfield. Would also prefer to have seen Nuhiu leave but as Washington says that would require someone actually wanting him!!! We have picked up an experienced midfielder but had to give up Winnall to get him, nowt to do with Nuhiu in the end, and we see a player leave on loan who was going to be on the bench at best and more often than not he wasn't even going to make that either!! If the FF thing is part of it, then hopefully it will help with the squad as well, but I think this was more of a footballing move!!
Remember this is a season long loan, we haven't sold him. So if he really does have potential, and certainly Imre doesn't think so, then lets hope he scores 20 goals for Derby because it won't be against us as he can't play against us and we could take him back at the end of the season and either sell him for much more or play him if he has improved. As he is a squad player at best, I think this is a good deal for us as long a Butterfield is good enough.
(01-09-2017, 00:51)peiowl Wrote: [quote='Owlkev71' pid='123501' dateline='1504217572']
We get rid of Winnall and keep Nuhiu, BIZARRE!!
I agree. Winnall has potential. Nuhiu has nothing to offer. Bad deal imo. But I'm glad you said it as I would have been lambasted if I had.
Remember this is a season long loan, we haven't sold him. So if he really does have potential, and certainly Imre doesn't think so, then lets hope he scores 20 goals for Derby because it won't be against us as he can't play against us and we could take him back at the end of the season and either sell him for much more or play him if he has improved. As he is a squad player at best, I think this is a good deal for us as long a Butterfield is good enough.