[Trusevich]

You're either deliberately refusing to - or simply cannot - understand.

I've enlightened you as to the source comment. That changes the later post's entire context and renders your point absolutely obsolete.

You were wrong, and no amount of insults and gnashing of teeth will make it right.

The fact you have to resort to these shows much. I'd go back and read that link to Freudian Defence Mechanisms that TheWorthinGer pointed you to if I were you.

[Fredstersafool]

I fully understand I responded to a post which you said merited media coverage that was all nothing else in the content,is that correct or not?

[Trusevich]

Yep, but your conclusion was arrived at erroneously, as pointed out to you since. That extra context changed everything, and made your conclusion wrong.

Let me know if you need any help with the big words.

[Fredstersafool]

It wasn't arrived at erroneously I responded clearly to a clear post from yourself,did you or did you not write that post???

[Trusevich]

I did.

If that post is taken completely out of context then your point could be correct.

[Fredstersafool]

Thank you for actually admitting to something for a change

How can it be taken out of context it's there in black and white.

[Trusevich]

Do I really have to explain?

I mean, really?

Jesus H Corbett.

[Fredstersafool]

No there's nothing to explain,my response to that particular post is correct.

[Trusevich]

Yep, correct if you have taken it out of context. Like I said. Taken in context, it makes little to no sense at all.

But you know this. That's why you're scrabbling about looking for a position that gives you even a glimmer of 'being right'.

[Fredstersafool]

It's not taken out of context though,it's a response to a post you made.

No scrabbling about at all I replied to YOUR post, a post that is clearly wrong regardless of what you posted earlier.