Posts: 1,732
Threads: 16
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
0
As you are not stating a fact while being particularly ambiguous, then yes, it's fair to assume that you are insinuating something.
What is it, if I haven't referenced it already?
Posts: 1,732
Threads: 16
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
0
Well, either that or you're just slevering shite like a retard, for no reason at all.
So, I'm glad my counter-claims to your trolling have been summarily ignored. Proves my point.
Posts: 2,774
Threads: 12
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
1
Woof woof,sure that's no you?? I threw you a bone and you jumped on it dafty.
Posts: 1,732
Threads: 16
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
0
18-11-2014, 18:24
(This post was last modified: 18-11-2014, 18:24 by Trusevich.)
Somers' statement seems straight-forward enough - due diligence being followed unlike previous boards.
I have the grave suspicion that the UoF/SoS/RST wankers won't be at all happy at that, the slevering hypocrites they are.
Posts: 18,119
Threads: 306
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
21
That's a pretty damning statement of the whole King offer!!! So many football transactions get scuppered by the lack of due diligence up front. Showing proof of funds should have been no problem to King, neither should he have been unwilling to name the partners in the consortium, just shows the crap that is being spouted by some participants in the whole saga!! MA may have other motives and may not be the most savoury character, but he stumped up the cash, and that is the current necessity!!