Thread For Anything But Football - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +----- Forum: Sheffield Wednesday (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +----- Thread: Thread For Anything But Football (/showthread.php?tid=1583) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
|
RE: Thread For Anything But Football - St Charles Owl - 27-04-2016 (27-04-2016, 14:33)peiowl Wrote:(26-04-2016, 21:42)St Charles Owl Wrote:(26-04-2016, 17:10)madsteve Wrote: The primary cause for the loss of lives was the culture in football at the time. I read yesterday that our situation in this verdict was no different to the previous inquests in terms of what our responsibility and role in this was. The safety certificate issue and layout of the turnstiles etc hasn't changed. This inquest didn't change anything as regards us from what I can see. On top of that we made a compensation payment to the families years ago so will that be classed as sufficient?? From what I can tell they key points from this inquest was the time of death for each individual was changed, Duckenfield was found guilty of unlawful deaths and the fans were completely exonerated. Going forward I can only see lawsuits arising out of this against someone, question is who they now go after, if it is us then I am sure we have insurance to cover the cost but this could well go on for some time yet. RE: Thread For Anything But Football - peiowl - 27-04-2016 (27-04-2016, 16:08)Statesideowl Wrote: I don't see how the clubs current regime can be made to pay anything for the actions of previous owners. I can believe that back then it was exceptionally easy to get your dodgy mate down at the council to whip up some certificates. I understand all of what you and SCO are saying and I sympathize with the gist of it but I'm not sure whether the law works that way. It is still SWFC regardless of changes in ownership. I'm also not sure how the culture of the times would enter into a modern day assessment of liabilities. I too remember going to Hillsborough and standing on the Kop. My dad would often joke about those metal barriers which were installed along the terraced steps all the way down the Kop as preventing people being crushed to death. Nobody knowingly made football stadiums unsafe places. But then, nobody knowingly gave thalidomide to pregnant women in the early '60s to cause deformed babies. Look at the cash settlements that resulted there. Or from asbestosis in miners. In Canada, we used to force First Nations' children to go to residential schools where they were often abused physically, sexually, emotionally. Our PM has already issued a public apology for that. Will there be class action suits to follow? Wouldn't be surprised. People who have lost loved ones do imo merit some form of compensation but from whom? If SWFC was working within the framework of the law at the time, as set by the Football League and ultimately, the government, maybe they are the ones to bear the principal burden. But if, as indicated in the report, SWFC was negligent in some ways, even by standards of the day, then they may not get a free pass. I hope SCO is right and insurance will cover any settlements. RE: Thread For Anything But Football - St Charles Owl - 27-04-2016 I am not sure how the law works with companies that essentially no longer exist today, which is the situation we are in. If anyone knows more about this then feel free to contribute. I think I am right in saying though that any legal action has to be applied to 1989 standards in terms of liability, expectations and so on, they cannot use modern day standards as the basis for litigation for something that occurred 30 years ago. Have we been found to be criminally negligent for anything though?? There are things within our realm that we considered causes or contributing factors in the disaster, but is that the same as criminally negligent? RE: Thread For Anything But Football - peiowl - 27-04-2016 I don't know. But, I do know that at least in North America, in civil suits the burden of proof is nowhere near as stringent as in criminal prosecutions, e.g. the O.J. Simpson business. The jury also concluded: Police errors caused a dangerous situation at the turnstiles Failures by commanding officers caused a crush on the terraces There were mistakes in the police control box over the order to open the Leppings Lane end exit gates Defects at the stadium, including calculations over crowd capacity, contributed to the disaster There was an error in the safety certification of the Hillsborough stadium South Yorkshire Police (SYP) and South Yorkshire Ambulance Service (SYAS) delayed declaring a major incident The emergency response was therefore delayed Sheffield Wednesday failed to approve the plans for dedicated turnstiles for each pen There was inadequate signage at the club and misleading information on match tickets Club officials should have requested a delay in kick off as they were aware of a huge number of fans outside shortly before the game was due to start From bbc report. See bullets 4,5, 8 & 9. Not sure about 10. Depends which "club" is responsible. RE: Thread For Anything But Football - Owlshighgreen - 28-04-2016 Trying to decide which is better this... https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u9Dg-g7t2l4 Or the original??? RE: Thread For Anything But Football - Jacko The Flopsy Piglet - 01-05-2016 Just a great song. Full stop. Really good interpretation though. In my mind it takes something really radical to be better than the original of a great song. RE: Thread For Anything But Football - peiowl - 05-05-2016 Here's one especially for imre. Colin's offspring look just like him. RE: Thread For Anything But Football - St Charles Owl - 05-05-2016 Pei, I have to question what websites or searches you are doing to even come up with a picture of Colin's family!!!! Are you stalking him as part of your love affair with him?? RE: Thread For Anything But Football - peiowl - 06-05-2016 (05-05-2016, 19:53)St Charles Owl Wrote: Pei, I have to question what websites or searches you are doing to even come up with a picture of Colin's family!!!! Are you stalking him as part of your love affair with him?? Sheffield Star? RE: Thread For Anything But Football - Imre varadi - 08-05-2016 Nice to see Khan get his head knocked off |